The Signal

ICE just pulled Polymarket data into the institutional plumbing. On Tuesday, Intercontinental Exchange launched Polymarket Signals and Sentiment, a new analytics product that normalizes Polymarket’s real-time + historical pricing for professional users—and made ICE the exclusive distributor of that data to institutional capital markets (Yahoo Finance; Traders Magazine; Markets Media).

This is not “TradFi discovers elections.” It’s a distribution deal that effectively turns Polymarket from a consumer trading venue into a wholesale data supplier—the same playbook exchanges used with equities and crypto: monetize the tape, then sell analytics on top.

The timing matters: coming right after Kalshi’s Super Bowl liquidity headline, ICE is signaling that prediction markets aren’t just a retail novelty—they’re becoming a dataset institutions will pay to ingest, even if they won’t (or can’t) trade on the underlying venue.

The Mechanism

• ICE is productizing the “prediction market tape.” By structuring and standardizing Polymarket data, ICE makes it ingestible for desks that live inside terminals, risk systems, and market-data workflows—where raw web odds don’t count.
• Exclusivity is a moat—and a constraint. ICE becoming the exclusive provider to institutional capital markets both (a) blocks rival data vendors from repackaging the same feed and (b) locks Polymarket into a single high-powered distribution channel.
• Polymarket gets institutional relevance without institutional onboarding. Even where institutions won’t touch offshore liquidity directly, they can still consume the signal as an input into macro, rates, commodities, and event-risk narratives.
• Data monetization becomes a second P&L line for prediction venues. If the venue can sell data independently of trading access, it de-risks revenue versus cyclical retail volume spikes.
• Competitive pressure shifts to “who owns the canonical signal.” Kalshi’s edge has been regulated distribution and onshore narratives; Polymarket’s new wedge is getting its prices embedded into institutional dashboards via ICE.
• Regulators will watch the boundary between “market insight” and “solicitation.” Packaging offshore prediction prices for institutions may invite questions about marketing, market integrity, and whether the underlying markets are sufficiently robust/defensible when used in professional contexts.

The Landscape

Market Position. Prediction markets are now fighting on two fronts: (1) consumer trading volume and (2) enterprise distribution. Kalshi just proved it can generate sportsbook-scale bursts under a CFTC framework, but those bursts also highlighted trust and operations risk (resolution disputes, traffic spikes). ICE’s Polymarket integration points the industry toward the next phase: professionalization via data, where the most valuable asset is not just liquidity—it’s a credible, widely distributed probability signal that can live alongside traditional market datasets.

Regulatory Environment. The regulatory split remains the industry’s defining fault line: CFTC-regulated venues and contract types vs offshore/global liquidity pools. ICE’s announcement carefully positions the product as data and analytics rather than trade access, but institutionalizing the signal increases scrutiny around underlying market quality, governance, and manipulation resistance—especially as mainstream media frames prediction markets as “another way to gamble” and spotlights enforcement-risk narratives (The Guardian; Womble Bond Dickinson).

Key Data

• Product launch: ICE released Polymarket Signals and Sentiment with real-time and historical Polymarket prediction market data packaged for professional workflows (Yahoo Finance).
• Distribution: ICE will be the exclusive provider of this Polymarket dataset to institutional capital markets (Traders Magazine).
• Strategic implication: Prediction markets now have a clearer “B2B attach” path—data licensing + analytics—beyond pure trading fees/spreads.
• Industry context: Kalshi’s Super Bowl milestone reset expectations for what regulated event contracts can do in peak moments (>$1B claimed volume, per our last edition), raising the value of any product that can translate prediction prices into institution-grade inputs.

What’s Next

Watch whether this ICE product becomes a one-off data SKU—or the start of a broader exchange-led packaging of prediction signals (indices, sector baskets, composite “event risk” dashboards, or terminal integrations). The near-term tell will be distribution: if ICE places Polymarket Signals inside the same procurement channels as its flagship market data, competitors will be forced to respond—either by locking up their own data partnerships (Kalshi with a rival vendor, or brokers/terminals) or by accelerating onshore, institution-friendly venues that let firms both consume the signal and trade it under a clearer U.S. regulatory frame.

Predict This covers the evolution of prediction markets — platforms, regulation, volume, and methodology. For questions or tips: reply to this email.

🌐 Visit whatsthelatest.ai for the latest coverage and more.

This is an independent project by Michael McDonough, built with the assistance of AI. Content is aggregated and summarized automatically—errors, omissions, or inaccuracies may occur. This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.